Some time ago, I interviewed James McCumiskey about the research of the German medical doctor Ryke Geerd Hamer about the origin of most diseases. Dr.Hamer's research includes an explanation of the origin of heart attacks (one of the most common diseases and causes of death in the world).I suggest you to read McCumiskey interview before of watching the following videos, in order to have a good idea of what Markolin is talking about.
Brief introduction:
Dr.Hamer distinguishes between a "coronary heart attack" and a "myocardial heart attack". Both of them are different, and (according to Dr.Hamer) correspond to different biological shocks. I won't expand on this because it would require an entire post. I'll mention just summary of one of such heart attacks according to Dr.Hamer's research.
In the case of "coronary heart attacks", the biological conflict is related to a "territorial loss" (e.g. loss of the job, loss of a wife or son, loss of a property, etc.) and the Hamer Herd/Foci (the brain manifestation of the biological shock) is empirically found ALWAYS in the right temporal lobe of the brain cortex. The following picture shows a Hamer Foci of a patient with this conflict of territorial loss and ulceration of the coronary arteries of the heart (look at the red arrow at right):
According to Dr.Hamer, the above patient had an angina pectoris (because the territorial loss conflict was still active, with the Hamer Foci in a target ring-like configuration), not a heart attack. During the active conflict phase, the patient had an ulceration of the coronary arteries which, in a certain point (and in order to avoid) a rupture of the coronary arteries, the organism produce a spam in the coronary arteries, and this is what is called "angina pectoris". (Note that in conventional medicine, angina pectoris is attributted to a stenosis of the coronary arteries; that is, the severe chest pain is considered to be due to ischemia (a lack of blood, thus a lack of oxygen supply) of the heart muscle. According to Hamer, this is not correct. Not all the patients with coronary stenosis will have an angina pectoris, even if their coronary arteries are largely obstructed. Hamer explains angina pectoris only appears during the conflict active phase of the territorial loss conflict and ulceration of the coronary arteries; and the reason why we can found people with coronary stenosis and angina pectoris is that many people active and solve, constantly, the same conflict; hence, we can see a man with a coronary stenosis who, after a conflict relapsed, is again suffering of chest pain...)Now, if the patient solves such territorial loss conflict, then (according to Dr.Hamer), we'll find stenosis in the coronary arteries of the heart (the stenosis would be the reparation of the previous ulceration, a reparation which includes cholesterol as part of the atheromatous plaque) and in the brain level in the same location (right temporal lobe of the brain) a Hamer Foci with an edematous configuration (and eventually, depending of the duration of the conflict, the presence of glial accumulation, what is commonly diagnosed as a brain tumour). An example would be this:
Dr.Hamer stresses that this kind of brain edema can, eventually, kill the patient (depending on the duration of the previous conflict and other factors), and the therapy in such cases can be very hard.But in any case, the point is that if Hamer's explanation of coronary heart attack is correct, it would be not only scientifically revolutionary, but that it could help some people to avoid coronary heart attacks, urging them to solve at time the conflict of territorial loss.
Keep in mind that it is only a crude summary of Dr.Hamer's research on coronary heart attacks. Many qualifications would be in order. My purpose is simply give you an idea of the topic.
Watch the following lecture by Caroline Markolin, which includes more details and qualifications of the ideas mentioned above:
0 comments:
Post a Comment