More evidence for Jime's Iron Law: The atheist attack on the laws of logic

Atheists are the champions of reason, science and logic, right? Well, not so fast. Check the above video, and think again.

According to Jime's Iron Law, hard-core atheists are demostrably stupid and irrational. If it were true, then you would expect precisely that atheists will use logic only instrumentally, i.e. provided it fits their anti-religious purposes. But if it doesn't fit with their purposes, then to THE HELL WITH LOGIC. And this is what they exactly do.

Note that the above evidence about the negation of logic is independent of other evidences supporting Jime's Iron Law (e.g. the atheist's egregious, stupid and retarded use of "nothing" as "something"... or even more absurdly, denying that anything at all exist, as seen in the last part of the last video). There are two independent lines of evidence for Jime's Iron Law which, by themselves, strongly support my law.

Another example of the operation of Jime's Iron Law can be seen in atheist Lewis Wolpert, when he conceded all the properties which the kalam argument implies regarding the cause of the universe, but instead of calling it God, he called it a "computer" (a "special computer"):

Now, does change the name of a thing would modify the thing's properties? Obviously not. Any sane and rational person, even ignorant ones, would easily understand this point.

If you concede that there is an inmaterial, spaceless, timeless, super powerful personal creator of the universe, you have essentially conceded that some version of theism is true (regardless of whether, on arbitrary grounds, you decide to call that cause "God", "Peter Pan", "Jime" or "University"). It is the cause's putative theological PROPERTIES (not its specific name or label) what is relevant to theism.

But as fully expected if Jime's Iron Law were true, Wolpert is intellectually incapable to understand this. It is simply beyond his intellectual powers. You shouldn't be surprised on this; on the contrary, you should to EXPECT an answer like that.

I'm not kidding here, folks. I'm very SERIOUS in my opinion that that Jime's Iron Law IS true regarding people like Wolpert, Dawkins, Krauss, Harris, Crossan and many other atheists. 

The evidence just seems to be overwhelming.

So far, Jime's Iron Law is purely descriptive (it simply attests the stupidity and imbecility of hard-core atheists), not explanatory. I strongly suspect that it has spiritual (and hence psychological) roots, but it is still a matter of speculation. I ignore the exact cause (or causes) which makes Jime's Iron Law operative.

I hope to discover soon the mechanisms underlying this law. Stay tuned.