According to this website, "Gotthard Barth was born February 4, 1913 in Reichenberg. [He graduated after only] five semesters in medicine and physics. After the war, [he took] 12 more semester at the University at Vienna in physics, mathematics and philosophy. Even as young student [he was a] strong critic of the law of thermodynamics.
Since 1948, involvement with the theory of relativity, lately criticism of relative mathematics and historical research into the begninnings of Einstein.
Since 1957, publisher of the magazine for basic physics, "Wissen im Werden". Physics publications" "Rational Physik, Energetische Waermetheorie, Einstein widerlegt (1954), Der gigantische Betrug mit Einstein (1987)". In philosophy: "Das Eine and das Werder", dialectric of the ancient Greeks. "Licht aus den Atomen", the dipole theory of light based on Greek dialectic was supposed to be published in 1984 by W. Wegener, publishers. Planned is "Rationale Ethik, Die Parasitentheorie". - Raum & Zeit, p. 70 (1989)"
Since 1948, involvement with the theory of relativity, lately criticism of relative mathematics and historical research into the begninnings of Einstein.
Since 1957, publisher of the magazine for basic physics, "Wissen im Werden". Physics publications" "Rational Physik, Energetische Waermetheorie, Einstein widerlegt (1954), Der gigantische Betrug mit Einstein (1987)". In philosophy: "Das Eine and das Werder", dialectric of the ancient Greeks. "Licht aus den Atomen", the dipole theory of light based on Greek dialectic was supposed to be published in 1984 by W. Wegener, publishers. Planned is "Rationale Ethik, Die Parasitentheorie". - Raum & Zeit, p. 70 (1989)"
I've been an admirer of Einstein for a long time. Recently, due in part to my own curiosity and in part to some debates I've had with Einstein's detractors, I've begun to study some literature which supports the idea that Einstein's theory of relativity is not correct.
My current opinion is that relativity theory is right and the evidence for it is good and strong.
But physicist Gotthard Barth has some arguments that undermine that view. Unfortunately, most articles by Barth are not in English. So far, I've only found this interesing article in English by Barth entitled EINSTEIN'S ERRORS. There, you can read some of his arguments.
Most criticisms of Einstein I've read are in regards to his supposed plagiarism (see for example this article or this other) as explained in this book:
But, personally, I'm more interested in whether the relativity theory is right or not (so, Einstein's supposed plagiarism is a less important topic for me.)
0 comments:
Post a Comment