This is a long interview with James McCumiskey, the author of a very intriguing and original book entitled The Ultimate Conspiracy: The Biomedical Paradigm. Without a doubt, the theses of this book will be very controversial for many (perhaps most) readers, but McCumiskey's clear, well-argued and documented book makes it a must read for people interested in alternative scientific understandings of the origin and treatment of cancer and other major diseases. I strongly suggest the readers of my blog to read carefully, objectively and critically McCumiskey's book, and specially the readers should try to check McCumiskey's factual claims for themselves and draw their own conclusions according to the best evidence. I thank James for accepting this interview. Enjoy.Above: Long and detailed 4-hour documentary (with English subtitles) about Dr.Hamer's research on cancer and other major diseases. Press the "cc" bottom (in the video) in order to activate the English subtitles. A perfect and accurate understanding of Dr.Hamer's theory is necessary in order to fully and properly understand, develop and qualify some of the ideas discussed in this interview
1-James tell us something about your background
I was a successful student at secondary school in Ireland and got a good Leaving Certificate. I studied Electronic Engineering at University College Dublin. After first year I knew I had chosen the wrong Degree, and should have chosen Accountancy or Economics. I felt obliged to continue on, but without any interest, failed many exams, and got a very poor degree. I think they felt sorry for me in the end! I got a job with Ericsson as a Telecommunications Engineer and enjoyed my time working for them. I studied accountancy at night, and passed my exams without ever having worked as one and eventually started working as an accountant.
Looking back, I knew I was on the wrong track studying engineering, but continued on with it, even though I should have bailed out. This experience took its toll on me, but I think now it was good in that it caused me to question everything. I took nothing for granted.
I also have healthy respect for Engineers and in particular that they deal with empirical evidence and not with theories, unlike the MDs.
2-Why did you get interested in medicine?
I got interested in medicine because in April 2002 my sister was diagnosed with skin cancer and went through the standard medical treatment. Chemo, radiation, lymph nodes removed etc. It clearly scared the hell out of her and she discovered the work of Dr Hamer and told me about it.
My father was diagnosed with liver cancer in August 2002. There was nothing much they could do for him and the oncologist predicted a short few months to live, because his liver was so enlarged. My sister got him to visit her GNM doctor in Belgium for a few sessions, but he was not able to take in the New Medicine, was too sick, and was too accepting of conventional medical wisdom.
I didn't know much about the New Medicine at the time but it made sense to me. The idea that a shock could cause cancer just made sense to me. After his death I resolved to study the New Medicine of Dr Hamer and bought his book Summary of the New Medicine - his only book that has been translated in to English. I read it for about a year and decided to write The Ultimate Conspiracy.
3-What do you mean by the "Biomedical Paradigm" and the "Ultimate Conspiracy"?
The Biomedical Paradigm describes the pattern of belief that underlies Modern Medicine. In the book I argue that Modern Medicine is a secular religion with a series of beliefs or dogmas that have no grounding in reality. The central dogma of Modern Medicine is the Germ Theory of Disease - the idea that bacteria and viruses cause disease. This central dogma is equivalent to the Resurrection for Christians - it is that central a belief for Modern Medicine.
The Biomedical Paradigm is the belief that disease is caused by germs, bacteria, faulty genes, carcinogens etc - Disease is caused from the outside but not from within - from ones own mind.
The Ultimate Conspiracy is that all MDs believe in the Biomedical Paradigm as do most people.
4-In your book, you defend the thesis of German virologist Stefan Lanka, according to which, pathogenic viruses have never been proved to exist according to the standard rules of virology for virus isolation. This is clearly an extraordinary claim which is very hard to believe. But, if such claim is true, it would cause a scientific and medical revolution. Can you tell us who Stefan Lanka is, and why do you give credit to his views?
I was a successful student at secondary school in Ireland and got a good Leaving Certificate. I studied Electronic Engineering at University College Dublin. After first year I knew I had chosen the wrong Degree, and should have chosen Accountancy or Economics. I felt obliged to continue on, but without any interest, failed many exams, and got a very poor degree. I think they felt sorry for me in the end! I got a job with Ericsson as a Telecommunications Engineer and enjoyed my time working for them. I studied accountancy at night, and passed my exams without ever having worked as one and eventually started working as an accountant.
Looking back, I knew I was on the wrong track studying engineering, but continued on with it, even though I should have bailed out. This experience took its toll on me, but I think now it was good in that it caused me to question everything. I took nothing for granted.
I also have healthy respect for Engineers and in particular that they deal with empirical evidence and not with theories, unlike the MDs.
2-Why did you get interested in medicine?
I got interested in medicine because in April 2002 my sister was diagnosed with skin cancer and went through the standard medical treatment. Chemo, radiation, lymph nodes removed etc. It clearly scared the hell out of her and she discovered the work of Dr Hamer and told me about it.
My father was diagnosed with liver cancer in August 2002. There was nothing much they could do for him and the oncologist predicted a short few months to live, because his liver was so enlarged. My sister got him to visit her GNM doctor in Belgium for a few sessions, but he was not able to take in the New Medicine, was too sick, and was too accepting of conventional medical wisdom.
I didn't know much about the New Medicine at the time but it made sense to me. The idea that a shock could cause cancer just made sense to me. After his death I resolved to study the New Medicine of Dr Hamer and bought his book Summary of the New Medicine - his only book that has been translated in to English. I read it for about a year and decided to write The Ultimate Conspiracy.
3-What do you mean by the "Biomedical Paradigm" and the "Ultimate Conspiracy"?
The Biomedical Paradigm describes the pattern of belief that underlies Modern Medicine. In the book I argue that Modern Medicine is a secular religion with a series of beliefs or dogmas that have no grounding in reality. The central dogma of Modern Medicine is the Germ Theory of Disease - the idea that bacteria and viruses cause disease. This central dogma is equivalent to the Resurrection for Christians - it is that central a belief for Modern Medicine.
The Biomedical Paradigm is the belief that disease is caused by germs, bacteria, faulty genes, carcinogens etc - Disease is caused from the outside but not from within - from ones own mind.
The Ultimate Conspiracy is that all MDs believe in the Biomedical Paradigm as do most people.
4-In your book, you defend the thesis of German virologist Stefan Lanka, according to which, pathogenic viruses have never been proved to exist according to the standard rules of virology for virus isolation. This is clearly an extraordinary claim which is very hard to believe. But, if such claim is true, it would cause a scientific and medical revolution. Can you tell us who Stefan Lanka is, and why do you give credit to his views?
Dr.Stefan LankaDr Stefan Lanka is around my age, born in 1963 in Germany. As a schoolboy he had an interest in understanding how Nature worked, and studied Biology at University. He got a PhD in Biology by isolating a virus called the ectocarpus siliculosus virus. He was very excited because he thought he had discovered the first stable virus-host relationship: The sea algae 'infected' with this virus thrived in its presence.
He wrote up his thesis in the late 1980s, and got his PhD, and was deemed to be an expert on viruses. The HIV-AIDS hysteria was at its peak and he read the scientific literature, but nowhere did he find any scientific publication where the HIV-virus had been isolated from the host cell. Nowhere! Naturally enough he was astounded, told everybody but nobody was interested. Dr Lanka moved on then from the HIV-virus to the 'viruses' that we vaccinate our children against such as mumps, measles and rubella, and again found no scientific paper where any scientist had managed to isolate them.
The outcome of all his research is that phagen exist, which meet the criteria of viruses, but do not harm the host organism. In 1 litre of sea-water there are millions of these viruses, and they are obviously not pathogenic.
The Germ Theory of Disease is wrong and viruses do not exist. You are right; acceptance of this will be a medical revolution, in fact a societal revolution - no doubt about it.
5-Assuming for the argument's sake that Lanka is correct, many questions arise. For example, if viruses don't exist, how do we explain the many photographs of viruses that we can see in virology textbooks and scientific websites? (An example would be this picture of HIV:
http://discover8.com/public/images/upload_article_images/080221183340.jpg )
He wrote up his thesis in the late 1980s, and got his PhD, and was deemed to be an expert on viruses. The HIV-AIDS hysteria was at its peak and he read the scientific literature, but nowhere did he find any scientific publication where the HIV-virus had been isolated from the host cell. Nowhere! Naturally enough he was astounded, told everybody but nobody was interested. Dr Lanka moved on then from the HIV-virus to the 'viruses' that we vaccinate our children against such as mumps, measles and rubella, and again found no scientific paper where any scientist had managed to isolate them.
The outcome of all his research is that phagen exist, which meet the criteria of viruses, but do not harm the host organism. In 1 litre of sea-water there are millions of these viruses, and they are obviously not pathogenic.
The Germ Theory of Disease is wrong and viruses do not exist. You are right; acceptance of this will be a medical revolution, in fact a societal revolution - no doubt about it.
5-Assuming for the argument's sake that Lanka is correct, many questions arise. For example, if viruses don't exist, how do we explain the many photographs of viruses that we can see in virology textbooks and scientific websites? (An example would be this picture of HIV:
http://discover8.com/public/images/upload_article_images/080221183340.jpg )
Above: three standards examples of photographs showing putative HIV particlesThe first question would be to ask how the photograph was taken? The second question would be to ask whether the HIV-virus was isolated from the host cell and biochemically characterised. The third question would be to ask for the name of the publication, so that one could replicate this. It must be reproducible - this isolation of the virus.
I have a 4-year history now of requesting from the Irish authorities scientific papers proving the existence of the H1N1 virus and also the mumps, measles and rubella viruses.
I have e-mailed and mailed letters to the Irish Minister for Health, and to the relevant Irish experts Dr Darina O'Flanagan Director of the HPSC, who recommend vaccinations, and also Professor Bill Hall Director of the National Virus Reference Laboratory at University College Dublin. Professor Bill Hall has studiously ignored my letters.
I have a 4-year history now of requesting from the Irish authorities scientific papers proving the existence of the H1N1 virus and also the mumps, measles and rubella viruses.
I have e-mailed and mailed letters to the Irish Minister for Health, and to the relevant Irish experts Dr Darina O'Flanagan Director of the HPSC, who recommend vaccinations, and also Professor Bill Hall Director of the National Virus Reference Laboratory at University College Dublin. Professor Bill Hall has studiously ignored my letters.
Dr.Darina O'Flanagan 
Professor William Hall In my last letter and e-mail to Professor Bill Hall, the most eminent Irish expert on viruses, I asked him the following four questions about the H1N1 virus as an example of a pathogenic virus:
1) Does Professor Bill Hall accept that the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus of approximately 120nm diameter has been isolated, biochemically characterised and photographed by Dr Stefan Lanka?
2) What is the approximate diameter of the H1N1 virus?
3) Why can Professor Bill Hall not cite a scientific publication proving the existence of the H1N1 virus?
4) Why can Professor Bill Hall and his NVRL colleagues not isolate the H1N1 virus in a similar manner like the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus and have this published in a scientific journal?
Professor Bill Hall, can silence me by answering these questions, but he can't. I hope he will have the courage and decency one day soon to fess up and admit there is no scientific evidence for the existence of any pathogenic virus.
1) Does Professor Bill Hall accept that the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus of approximately 120nm diameter has been isolated, biochemically characterised and photographed by Dr Stefan Lanka?
2) What is the approximate diameter of the H1N1 virus?
3) Why can Professor Bill Hall not cite a scientific publication proving the existence of the H1N1 virus?
4) Why can Professor Bill Hall and his NVRL colleagues not isolate the H1N1 virus in a similar manner like the Ectocarpus siliculosus virus and have this published in a scientific journal?
Professor Bill Hall, can silence me by answering these questions, but he can't. I hope he will have the courage and decency one day soon to fess up and admit there is no scientific evidence for the existence of any pathogenic virus.
6-Also, if viruses don't exist, how are we going to explain the efficacy of vaccinations in the elimination of viral diseases?
I explain this in my book in Chapter 13 The Myth that Vaccinations are Safe and Effective. To take the examples of measles, the death rate from measles had declined by about 98% by the time the vaccine was introduced, and merely continued on its long-term decline after the introduction of the vaccine. Medical text-books link the decline in deaths from measles, with the introduction of the vaccine but conveniently ignore the estimated 98% decline prior to the introduction of the vaccine.
I explain this in my book in Chapter 13 The Myth that Vaccinations are Safe and Effective. To take the examples of measles, the death rate from measles had declined by about 98% by the time the vaccine was introduced, and merely continued on its long-term decline after the introduction of the vaccine. Medical text-books link the decline in deaths from measles, with the introduction of the vaccine but conveniently ignore the estimated 98% decline prior to the introduction of the vaccine.
Graphics based on the The Vital Statistics of the United States starting in the 1900sThe decline in all of these diseases was due to improved nutrition, clean water and decent housing. That's it.
7-In the book, you question the Germ Theory of Disease, which is one of the pillars of Modern Medicine. However, it seems to be a fact that (even if we concede for the argument's sake that viruses don't exist) some microbes cause many diseases (e.g. lung tuberculosis is caused by Koch's bacilus). How are you going to question or doubt such obvious and commonly accepted scientific fact?
To answer this question I need to bring in the New Medicine of Dr Hamer. Every cancer / disease is caused by a severe shock. When the shock occurs, and the cancer/disease starts, one is in the Conflict-Active phase thinking about the event that caused the terrible shock. If one solves the shock, then one is in the healing phase or the reparation phase where the body recovers from shock.
This is the amazing thing about lung tuberculosis. It occurs in the healing or the reparation phase, and this is how the organism recovers from alveolar lung cancer. So lung tuberculosis is the reparation phase of alveolar lung cancer.
Let's go back one step. The preceding shock that caused all of this was a 'fear of death' biological shock. This is probably the most elemental shock. The body responds to this type of shock by multiplying the alveolii cells. This is called alveolar lung cancer. When the 'fear of death' biological shock is solved, one gets lung tuberculosis and one coughs out the excess alveolii, which appear as a bloody sputum, and you think "oh shit I'm going to die", and the doctors don't really help, in fact the contrary, and then u get another fear of death biological shock and then u die.
In relation to the bacilli that are present when one has lung tuberculosis, this is correct. The MDs assume wrongly that these microbes caused lung tuberculosis. In other terms, does snow cause winter? Do flies cause dung-heaps? Yes the microbes are present, but they did not cause the disease, on the contrary they are there helping the body to get rid of the excessive alveolar cells.
8-You have defended the medical views of another German scientist, the physician specialized in internal medicine Dr.Ryke Geerd Hamer, about the cause of cancer and other major diseases. Can you explain to us the basics of Hamer's theory?
7-In the book, you question the Germ Theory of Disease, which is one of the pillars of Modern Medicine. However, it seems to be a fact that (even if we concede for the argument's sake that viruses don't exist) some microbes cause many diseases (e.g. lung tuberculosis is caused by Koch's bacilus). How are you going to question or doubt such obvious and commonly accepted scientific fact?
To answer this question I need to bring in the New Medicine of Dr Hamer. Every cancer / disease is caused by a severe shock. When the shock occurs, and the cancer/disease starts, one is in the Conflict-Active phase thinking about the event that caused the terrible shock. If one solves the shock, then one is in the healing phase or the reparation phase where the body recovers from shock.
This is the amazing thing about lung tuberculosis. It occurs in the healing or the reparation phase, and this is how the organism recovers from alveolar lung cancer. So lung tuberculosis is the reparation phase of alveolar lung cancer.
Let's go back one step. The preceding shock that caused all of this was a 'fear of death' biological shock. This is probably the most elemental shock. The body responds to this type of shock by multiplying the alveolii cells. This is called alveolar lung cancer. When the 'fear of death' biological shock is solved, one gets lung tuberculosis and one coughs out the excess alveolii, which appear as a bloody sputum, and you think "oh shit I'm going to die", and the doctors don't really help, in fact the contrary, and then u get another fear of death biological shock and then u die.
In relation to the bacilli that are present when one has lung tuberculosis, this is correct. The MDs assume wrongly that these microbes caused lung tuberculosis. In other terms, does snow cause winter? Do flies cause dung-heaps? Yes the microbes are present, but they did not cause the disease, on the contrary they are there helping the body to get rid of the excessive alveolar cells.
8-You have defended the medical views of another German scientist, the physician specialized in internal medicine Dr.Ryke Geerd Hamer, about the cause of cancer and other major diseases. Can you explain to us the basics of Hamer's theory?
Dr.Ryke Geerd HamerDr Hamer has come up with a body of work called New Medicine or German New Medicine GNM. Dr Hamer tried to patent the term 'New Medicine' but couldn't hence the term ' German New Medicine', which he copy-righted.
GNM has 5 biological laws:
1st Biological Law - The Iron Rule of Cancer - IRC
Dr Hamer discovered this law in relation to cancer and called it the IRC, because he thought he had discovered the cause of cancer. Later he discovered that is was the cause of all other disease like MS etc.
The IRC is that every cancer / disease is caused by a severe, dramatic and isolating shock occurring on all three levels of the human: the psyche, the brain and the organ.
GNM has 5 biological laws:
1st Biological Law - The Iron Rule of Cancer - IRC
Dr Hamer discovered this law in relation to cancer and called it the IRC, because he thought he had discovered the cause of cancer. Later he discovered that is was the cause of all other disease like MS etc.
The IRC is that every cancer / disease is caused by a severe, dramatic and isolating shock occurring on all three levels of the human: the psyche, the brain and the organ.
Dr Hamer calls the biological shock the Dirk Hamer Syndrome. Dr Hamer's 19-year old son Dirk Hamer died in incredibly tragic circumstances, and a few months later Dr Hamer got cancer a teratoma in his right testicle. After he recovered from cancer, he resolved to investigate his belief that cancer was caused by a severe shock. This work resulted in the 5 biological laws of the German New Medicine.2nd Biological Law - The two-phases of every cancer/disease
Every Cancer/ Disease has two phases provided the conflict is resolved. The first phase is called the 'conflict-active' phase, which occurs after the biological shock or DHS. The second phase is called the 'healing-phase' by Dr Hamer, but personally I prefer the term 'reparation phase', and this occurs when the biological conflict has been resolved.3rd Biological Law - The ontogenetic system of tumors and cancer equivalent diseases.
This states that the symptoms of a cancer/disease in the conflict-active phase and the reparation phase depends on the germ layer the respective organ is made up from. This is what 'ontogenetic' means.For example all organs made up from the endoderm germ layer exhibit tumour growth in the conflict-active phase, and experience tumour degradation/ cell destruction in the reparation phase.
Dr Hamer is particularly proud of this 3rd Biological Law. He had cracked the connection between Conflict state and the symptoms that were occurring.
Fourth Biological Law - The ontogenetic system of microbes.
This law states the type of microbes that operate in the reparation phase, which are dependent on the germ layer of the diseased organ.The amazing thing about microbes is they help us to recover from cancer / disease. They are our little helpers and they do not cause disease.
Germs do not cause disease.
Fifth Biological Law - The Quintessence
This law is really the most significant of the Biological Laws. Cancer or Disease is a Meaningful Biological Program of Nature - in German Sinnvolles Biologisches Sonderprogramm der Natur, abbreviated SBS.
The shock occurred, and the body tried to solve the biological conflict by the disease or cancer. This turns our understanding of disease upside down and inside out.
For example a mother sees her child knocked down and gets a shock. Some time later the child recovers but the right-handed mother has alump on her left breast. She has glandular breast cancer. The original shock was caring conflict for her child knocked down. The body responds by increasing the milk producing capacity of left breast causing the lump or tumour. Once u understand this, the fear of cancer /disease melts away.
Cancer occurs for a reason. Wow! That is really something isn't it!
9-Which is the difference between a psychological conflict and what Hamer calls a "biological conflict", and which are the conditions for the generation of the latter?
The conditions for a biological shock, known as a DHS - Dirk Hamer Syndrome - are that the shock is sever, acute dramatic and isolative. Harald Bauman an experienced GNM therapist who worked with Dr Hamer for 5 years believes that the isolative characteristic of the DHS is the most significant - the shock is so terrible the person cannot talk to anyone about it.
You can have ongoing little squabbles with your wife, work colleagues, children etc, which can cause sleepless nights and are psychological conflicts but because they don't have the characteristics required for a DHS they don't cause disease.
10-Does a DHS need to be a caused by a big problem, or it could be related to small incidents like a casual bad remark?
A DHS could be caused by overhearing a work colleague say that you are not a good worker - if the person concerned prided themselves on their work and their self-esteem was built around their work. Again the conditions of the DHS must be met.
11-Hamer has written that the view of conventional medicine about the "metastases" of cancer is wrong. Can you explain the well-known phenomenon called "metastases" in conventional medicine, according to Hamer's theory?
Metastasis is the major dogma of cancer. It is a belief with no grounding in reality. It is the belief that cancer originates somewhere in the body and spreads through blood cells or lymph nodes even though nobody has every observed these cancer spreading cells because they do not exist.
Just say you are diagnosed with cancer - say bowel cancer. And you get a shock from this diagnosis and think I'm gonna die. You then get lung cancer - alveolar lung cancer. The MDs state that the cancer spread from the bowel to the lungs. The primary cancer being in the bowel, and the secondary cancer in the lungs. This is what is meant by metastases.
GNM state that you just had another shock. Cancer does not spread, and metastases is just another medical dogma.
12-How do we explain the cases where a person is diagnosed with cancer and, at the moment of the diagnosis, she already has several metastases?
A shock can have a number of different aspects causing multiple cancers. For example if the woman loses her job and can no longer provide for her children, she might get a major self-devaluation conflict and get osteoporosis. At the same time she might think my children are going to starve to death, because there is not enough money, and she also gets liver cancer. So one shock - suddenly losing your job - could have different emotional aspects for the woman concerned and cause different cancers simultaneously.
13-Some critics say that Hamer hasn't discovered anything new, because it's well know that emotional stress and depression can cause or predispose to some diseases. Are the critics right?
The DHS is not simply an "emotional stress" or "depression" or "anxiety", but that the DHS is a whole new phenomenon, with specific defining characteristics, discoveried by Dr.Hamer and not related to previous psychological concepts. Depression or "stress" is not the cause of any disease. But they can be the consequence of a biological conflict.
The confusion is perhaps caused by the fact that during the conflict active phase, the patient is in a state of lasting sympathicotonic stress tonus. So this specific biological stress, which is part of the first phase of the biological program, is erroneously confused with the more generic and popular, but medically irrelevant, psychological stress.
It's essential to avoid any confusion between the concepts of "stress", "anxieties", "worries" and so forth and the more specific technical concept of DHS.
14-If cancer is caused by a biological shock, as Hamer, says, how do you explain the cases of leukemia and other cancers in babies and even in animals? Do babies and animals suffer of "biological shocks"?
Yes!
Leukemia is an interesting cancer. Again you need to understand what caused it. The shock is a severe devaluation conflict. This causes bone cancer or osteolysis in the conflict-active phase, and in the reparation phase leukemia. The solution to leukemia is just let the child recover from the self-devaluation conflict and give medical treatment (e.g. blood tranfusions or cortisone to the brain edema) if temporary organic or cerebral complications arise. This is in stark contrast to what the oncologists do today.
15-Assuming for the argument's sake that cancer is caused by biological shocks, what implications have this discovery for the treatment of cancer?
The implications are enormous. About 95% of Modern Medicine is scientifically and medically wrong. Modern Medicine is brilliant for trauma, plastic surgery, burns, broken bones etc. But the rest of it is worse than useless because it kills off people unnecessarily and prematurely.
The implications are so stark, the medical profession won't agree to the open testing of Dr Hamer's GNM.
16-Can you tell us which is, exactly, the specific treatment of cancer that Hamer proposes?
In my book, I give a number of examples of patients that Harald Baumann (the renowned Swiss GNM therapist) helped.
One case was Paulo a scuba-diver diagnosed with lung cancer and given a few months to live. What happened to Paulo was he learned to scuba dive with his friends. On one of their first major dives, things went badly wrong, he lost contact with his buddy, was running out of air and did not have enough time to make it safely to the surface. His buddy eventually appeared, they shared air to the top, but went up too quickly but he survived.
But every time he went scuba diving he thought he was going to die when he put on the wet-suit.
He explained his story to Harald Baumann. Harald explained to him the 5 biological laws. Paolo knew that the MDs were predicting imminent death but he wanted to live.
The solution:- Paolo stopped scuba diving, sold his scuba equipment. He had subsequent visits to the MD, but it was a case of spontaneous remission and the MD wasn't interested.
17-Does Hamer's theory explain the rare medical phenomenon known as "spontaneous remission" of cancer?
Spontaneous remission means the person has solved the conflict causing their cancer and the cancer has gone away. Nothing more and nothing less. There is no magic involved with German New Medicine.
18-Which is the scientific evidence supporting Hamer's theory? Can the lay reader of this interview verify, by himself or herself, if Hamer is right or not? Or do they need a specialized medical training in order to test Hamer's theory?
We are conditioned to believe in hierarchies and to believe in the experts, particularly the doctors.
One simple way to verify GNM is say a woman is diagnosed with breast cancer. Ask which breast, left or right and determine if the woman is right-handed or left-handed. If she is right-handed then the left-breast will mean a mother-child conflict and a right-breast means a partner conflict. Check it out!
Dr Hamer got a teratoma on his right testicle. He is right-handed. He considered his 19-year old son Dirk to be grown up and to be his partner or equal - Hence his right testicle was affected by cancer.
This also applies to rashes eczema etc.
19-Is Hamer's theory a falsifiable scientific theory? I mean, suppose that Hamer were wrong, what kind of empirical evidence would refute his theory?
Dr Hamer's theory is falsifiable. To my mind the most compelling evidence is the brain CT scan. In the conflict-active phase you see concentric rings around the brain relay viewable on a brain CT-scan. When the conflict is resolved the concentric rings become oedematic and are blurred. This is what the MDs call a brain tumour.
Give the disease, Dr Hamer's disease chart can tell u the nature of the shock that caused it and the symptoms in the conflict-active phase and the reparation phase. What people like me want is for Dr Hamer's New Medicine to be openly tested and compared with standard medical therapies for a number of agreed medical conditions. We're not afraid of the Truth.
20-Hamer has said that biological shocks leave a ring-like trace in the brain which is easily seen with a brain scan (the so-called Hamer Herd or Hamer Focus). However, critics say that such ring-like images are actually "ring artefacts" caused by the scan's malfunctioning and are well known by radiologists. How do you reply to these critics?
In my book, I mention that Dr Hamer himself spoke with the Siemen's Chief Engineer and he agreed that they could not be artefacts.
The way to prove this is very simple and could be done by any working radiologist with a knowledge of German New Medicine.
What is required is patients in the conflict-active phase, with a tumour growing, the tissue layer being endodermal in origin, such as liver parencyma, lungs alveolii, etc.
Now this can be verified on three levels of the human organism:- psyche, brain and organ. All of this is predicted by Dr Hamer's GNM.
Psyche level:- Person is thinking /obsessing about the conflict
Organ level:- Tumour is growing
Brain Level:- The HH Hamer Herd (in German) or Hamer Focus in English, is in target configuration. The HH is like a series of concentric rings centred on the affected brain relay. It is clearly viewable on a brain CT-scan.
Brain CT-picture: showing an example of a typical Hamer Focus in the conflict active phase (target-ring configuration) in a person diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). According to Dr.Hamer, MS always corresponds to a “motor conflict”, experienced subjectively as “not being able to escape” or “feeling stuck”, which impacts in the brain in the motor cortex that controls the muscle movements. This particular patient had paralyses affecting both arms.
Diagram of the cerebral cortex: Motor cortex in blueThe way to prove the assertion that HHs in target configuration are not artefacts, is that as above one obtains a patient and does a brain CT-scan - say picture 1 and the HH in target configuration is observed (concentric rings around the affected brain relay).
The patient is moved 2-3 cm to the left and a brain CT-scan is repeated. If it is an artefact the artefact should remain in the same position. However if the "artefact" moves then, this would indicate that it is a phenomonen on the patient's brain detected by the brain CT-scan, and is as Dr Hamer says what it is.
More photographs could be taken, 2-3cm to the right, to the front and to the back to prove that the "artefact" is not an artefact but is a naturally occurring phenomenon on the patient's brain. Again the "artefact" will move, proving that it is not an artefact and is in fact a HH as Dr Hamer has stated.
This is really simple, if the concentric rings are an artefact, they would appear on the same position in the CT-scan photograph. If they are a HH in target configuration, they will move when the patient moves. This experiment would provide conclusive proof that HHs are real occuring phenomena as stated by Dr Hamer.
21-According to Hamer, specific Hamer Herds are always localized in the same brain location corresponding to the specific type of cancer. For example, a lobular (non-ductal) breast cancer in the right breast has always, in every case, a corresponding Hamer Herd in the left part of the cerebellum. Another example: Womb (cervical) cancer will have the Hamer Herd in the left temporal lobe of the brain. If it were true, the critics' objection against the existence of Hamer Herds would be refuted. Have you seen directly the Hamer Herds in the brain of cancer patients? Do they correspond to the exact brain location related to the specific kind of organ cancer that Hamer's theory predict?
The patient is moved 2-3 cm to the left and a brain CT-scan is repeated. If it is an artefact the artefact should remain in the same position. However if the "artefact" moves then, this would indicate that it is a phenomonen on the patient's brain detected by the brain CT-scan, and is as Dr Hamer says what it is.
More photographs could be taken, 2-3cm to the right, to the front and to the back to prove that the "artefact" is not an artefact but is a naturally occurring phenomenon on the patient's brain. Again the "artefact" will move, proving that it is not an artefact and is in fact a HH as Dr Hamer has stated.
This is really simple, if the concentric rings are an artefact, they would appear on the same position in the CT-scan photograph. If they are a HH in target configuration, they will move when the patient moves. This experiment would provide conclusive proof that HHs are real occuring phenomena as stated by Dr Hamer.
21-According to Hamer, specific Hamer Herds are always localized in the same brain location corresponding to the specific type of cancer. For example, a lobular (non-ductal) breast cancer in the right breast has always, in every case, a corresponding Hamer Herd in the left part of the cerebellum. Another example: Womb (cervical) cancer will have the Hamer Herd in the left temporal lobe of the brain. If it were true, the critics' objection against the existence of Hamer Herds would be refuted. Have you seen directly the Hamer Herds in the brain of cancer patients? Do they correspond to the exact brain location related to the specific kind of organ cancer that Hamer's theory predict?
Above: Brain CT-picture showing a typical example of an actual Hamer Focus in the left side of the cerebellum corresponding to a woman diagnosed with a growing glandular (lobular) breast cancer in the right breast
Above: Brain CT-picture showing a typical example of an actual Hamer Focus in the right side of the cerebellum corresponding to a woman diagnosed with a growing glandular (lobular) breast cancer in the left breast
Dr.Hamer's diagram for the brain relays in the cerebellum according to his empirical findings. Compare the specific brain relays corresponding in the cerebellum to the right and left breasts (in the diagram) with the previous pictures of CT scans showing a Hamer Focus in precisely that relay in the case of two women diagnosed with a right and left (lobular) breast cancer.I personally am not a GNM therapist. Not yet anyway! I wrote the book to inform the general population in the english-speaking world about Dr Hamer's New Medicine. Dr Hamer's disease chart is very specific and there is a specific brain relay which controls a specific organ. So as you say for glandular breast cancer, the affected brain relay will be in a specific location in the left cerebellum.
Dr Hamer's disease chart (which should be in every home) gives the location of all the brain relays and what organ they control, and the nature of the conflict that caused the cancer / disease.
22-Let's to discuss about a specific common disease: breast cancer. Most breast cancers in women are of "ductal" or "intraductal" type (i.e. a cancer which beigns inside the ducts of the breast). According to Hamer, which is the cause of such intraductal breast cancer? Give us some real-life examples, if it's possible.
I should mention at the outset that Dr Hamer has produced a scientific chart, which clearly explains the cause of all cancers and other diseases on the three levels, the psyche, the brain and the organ.
If one wants to look up any cancer, it is just a matter of referring to the scientific chart. This can be purchased from Ilsedora Laker or Caroline Markolin, www.newmedicine.ca and www.learningnm.ca
The scientific chart of German New Medicine is truly revolutionary, because it details the cause of all diseases/cancers and the course of these diseases in the conflict-active phase and reparation phase and really should be in every home, and should be required learning for all high-school students - It is that important.
Intraductal breast cancer is caused by a brutal separation conflict, where the woman believes the beloved person is taken suddenly from her in a brutal manner. The milk ducts widen to allow the milk to flow away, that is not necessary (metaphorically) for the bloved person that has been taken away. This causes the breast to shrink if it goes on long enough.
Dr Hamer has a picture in one of his books, which is striking, of a middle-aged woman with one breast significantly smaller than the other. Her father died, and this was a brutal separation conflict for the woman. She was right-handed, I think, and consequently it was her right breast that was affected. The laterality rule is that the right breast is affected for partner conflcits and the left breast for mother-child conflicts, if the woman is right-handed. It is reversed if the woman is left-handed.
There was no solution to this conflict, because the father was dead. The woman can live with a shrinking right breast, or have it removed surgically and have an implant inseted to make both breasts the same size. The choice would be entirely up to the concerned woman.
23-What about womb (cervical) cancer. Which is the biological conflict that causes womb cancer?
Straight off the bat I don't know, I would have to look up the scientific chart. Having done that I discovered that cervical cancer occurs in the reparation phase or in the healing phase of a sexual frustration conflict.
In the conflict-active phase the cervix widens or ulcerates to more easily the sexual copulation with the desired partner, and in the reparation phase this ulceration is repaired causing the cervical cancer. This is my understanding from a quick read of the scientific chart. I am not a working GNM therapist and only have a layman's understanding of cancers and diseases, but this is the limit of my knowledge.
If this is the case, the solution with cervical cancer is to understand that the patient is is in the reparation phase and to fully understand the conflict that caused the cervical cancer and that the woman has resolved it. She needs to be congratulated. And most importantly one must avoid panic (in order to avoid new conflicts and metastases) and, if necessary, to address with medical means (e.g. with cortisone) some possible cerebral complications (caused by the healing Hamer Focus) which only appear in some patients. The cervical cancer itself is already the healing phase and, of itself is innocuous.
24-What about the different types of lung cancer (lung adenocarcinoma, bronchial cancer and the small cell lung cancer)?
I'll just take one of these as an example - alveolar lung cancer. The most elemental fear is fear of death. One can survive without food for weeks, without water for days but only minutes without air.
The Fear of Death biological shock causes the alveolii to multiply, so-called alveolar lung cancer. The biological purpose is to ensure that the person can take in more oxygen from a given quantity of air, to survive longer in a fear of death biological shock.
In my book I give the example of Paolo - a scuba-diver, who was a patient of the famous Swiss GNM therapist Harald Baumann.
Basically Paolo came to Harald in a panic, having been diagnosed with alveolar lung cancer, and given 3-months to live, if that. Straight away Harald knew from experience (and from Dr Hamer's scientific chart) that alveolar lung cancer is caused by a fear of death biological shock. Harald asked Paolo could he tell him when he had such an incident.
Paolo had taken up scuba-diving and had completed his basic training. He was on his first dive in open water. He was about 30m below the surface, when he realised two things 1) he did not have enough air left to make it to the surface safely 2) He lost track of his buddy.
Clearly Paolo was in a panic. He didn't know what to do. He waited for what seemed like a long time, but it was just a few minutes, until his diving buddy came along. They shared air to the surface, and although he came up too quickly and suffered some problems he was fine.
The problem was that Paolo continued on diving, because all his friends were doing it and he felt obliged to continue scuba-diving. He describes the feeling that everytime he put on the wet-suit he thought he was going to die. He continued on scuba diving and every single time he put on his wet-suit, all he could think was , I'm gonna die! This continued for a few months, and he developed lung cancer - a fear of death biological shock - went to the Doctor and was diagnosed and then went to Harald in a blind panic.
After Harald explained to Paolo GNM and that lung cancer is caused by a fear of death biological shock, and Paolo understood how he had obtained his fear of death biological shock - the solution presented itself to Paolo. Paolo came up with a solution that suited him. The important thing in GNM therapy is that the patient comes up with a solution for himself, it must be the patient's solution for it to work.
Paolo sold his wet-suit and his scuba-diving eqpt and just gave it up completely.This was a definitive solution to his Fear of Death Biological Shock.
Harald told him that he would get tuberculois in the reparation phase, and would be coughing excess alveolii cells, which would by blood-filled sputum. Paolo was prepared for this, understood what was happening and weathered it.
Paolo survived his lung cancer and his tuberculosis, and is alive and well.
Dr Hamer's disease chart (which should be in every home) gives the location of all the brain relays and what organ they control, and the nature of the conflict that caused the cancer / disease.
22-Let's to discuss about a specific common disease: breast cancer. Most breast cancers in women are of "ductal" or "intraductal" type (i.e. a cancer which beigns inside the ducts of the breast). According to Hamer, which is the cause of such intraductal breast cancer? Give us some real-life examples, if it's possible.
I should mention at the outset that Dr Hamer has produced a scientific chart, which clearly explains the cause of all cancers and other diseases on the three levels, the psyche, the brain and the organ.
If one wants to look up any cancer, it is just a matter of referring to the scientific chart. This can be purchased from Ilsedora Laker or Caroline Markolin, www.newmedicine.ca and www.learningnm.ca
The scientific chart of German New Medicine is truly revolutionary, because it details the cause of all diseases/cancers and the course of these diseases in the conflict-active phase and reparation phase and really should be in every home, and should be required learning for all high-school students - It is that important.
Intraductal breast cancer is caused by a brutal separation conflict, where the woman believes the beloved person is taken suddenly from her in a brutal manner. The milk ducts widen to allow the milk to flow away, that is not necessary (metaphorically) for the bloved person that has been taken away. This causes the breast to shrink if it goes on long enough.
Dr Hamer has a picture in one of his books, which is striking, of a middle-aged woman with one breast significantly smaller than the other. Her father died, and this was a brutal separation conflict for the woman. She was right-handed, I think, and consequently it was her right breast that was affected. The laterality rule is that the right breast is affected for partner conflcits and the left breast for mother-child conflicts, if the woman is right-handed. It is reversed if the woman is left-handed.
There was no solution to this conflict, because the father was dead. The woman can live with a shrinking right breast, or have it removed surgically and have an implant inseted to make both breasts the same size. The choice would be entirely up to the concerned woman.
23-What about womb (cervical) cancer. Which is the biological conflict that causes womb cancer?
Straight off the bat I don't know, I would have to look up the scientific chart. Having done that I discovered that cervical cancer occurs in the reparation phase or in the healing phase of a sexual frustration conflict.
In the conflict-active phase the cervix widens or ulcerates to more easily the sexual copulation with the desired partner, and in the reparation phase this ulceration is repaired causing the cervical cancer. This is my understanding from a quick read of the scientific chart. I am not a working GNM therapist and only have a layman's understanding of cancers and diseases, but this is the limit of my knowledge.
If this is the case, the solution with cervical cancer is to understand that the patient is is in the reparation phase and to fully understand the conflict that caused the cervical cancer and that the woman has resolved it. She needs to be congratulated. And most importantly one must avoid panic (in order to avoid new conflicts and metastases) and, if necessary, to address with medical means (e.g. with cortisone) some possible cerebral complications (caused by the healing Hamer Focus) which only appear in some patients. The cervical cancer itself is already the healing phase and, of itself is innocuous.
24-What about the different types of lung cancer (lung adenocarcinoma, bronchial cancer and the small cell lung cancer)?
I'll just take one of these as an example - alveolar lung cancer. The most elemental fear is fear of death. One can survive without food for weeks, without water for days but only minutes without air.
The Fear of Death biological shock causes the alveolii to multiply, so-called alveolar lung cancer. The biological purpose is to ensure that the person can take in more oxygen from a given quantity of air, to survive longer in a fear of death biological shock.
In my book I give the example of Paolo - a scuba-diver, who was a patient of the famous Swiss GNM therapist Harald Baumann.
Basically Paolo came to Harald in a panic, having been diagnosed with alveolar lung cancer, and given 3-months to live, if that. Straight away Harald knew from experience (and from Dr Hamer's scientific chart) that alveolar lung cancer is caused by a fear of death biological shock. Harald asked Paolo could he tell him when he had such an incident.
Paolo had taken up scuba-diving and had completed his basic training. He was on his first dive in open water. He was about 30m below the surface, when he realised two things 1) he did not have enough air left to make it to the surface safely 2) He lost track of his buddy.
Clearly Paolo was in a panic. He didn't know what to do. He waited for what seemed like a long time, but it was just a few minutes, until his diving buddy came along. They shared air to the surface, and although he came up too quickly and suffered some problems he was fine.
The problem was that Paolo continued on diving, because all his friends were doing it and he felt obliged to continue scuba-diving. He describes the feeling that everytime he put on the wet-suit he thought he was going to die. He continued on scuba diving and every single time he put on his wet-suit, all he could think was , I'm gonna die! This continued for a few months, and he developed lung cancer - a fear of death biological shock - went to the Doctor and was diagnosed and then went to Harald in a blind panic.
After Harald explained to Paolo GNM and that lung cancer is caused by a fear of death biological shock, and Paolo understood how he had obtained his fear of death biological shock - the solution presented itself to Paolo. Paolo came up with a solution that suited him. The important thing in GNM therapy is that the patient comes up with a solution for himself, it must be the patient's solution for it to work.
Paolo sold his wet-suit and his scuba-diving eqpt and just gave it up completely.This was a definitive solution to his Fear of Death Biological Shock.
Harald told him that he would get tuberculois in the reparation phase, and would be coughing excess alveolii cells, which would by blood-filled sputum. Paolo was prepared for this, understood what was happening and weathered it.
Paolo survived his lung cancer and his tuberculosis, and is alive and well.
Brain CT-picture of a patient diagnosed with lung cancer (adenocarcinoma). Typical Hamer Focus in the conflict active phase in the right side of the brain stem (pons) which, according to Dr.Hamer, corresponds always to this specific kind of lung cancer. In the case of lung tuberculosis (which appears only after the solution of the death-fright conflict), the same Hamer Focus won't have the target-right configuration (typical of the conflict active phase) anymore, and at the same location of the brain stem we only see a brain edema as sign of healing.25-What about heart attacks? Does Hamer's theory explain heart infartion and heart attacks?
I'll talk about heart attacks. which are called heart infarcts.
The conflict is a territorial conflict. Someone or something is challenging your territory and u are fighting for it. Dr Hamer, gives the example of a stag being challenged for control by a younger stag. In the conflict-active phase, the arteries ulcerated and widen so that more blood flows and the animal/person has more energy to fight back for his territory.
Once the territory conflict is resolved the arteries repair themselves in the reparation phase. A territorial conflict can be fatal only if the typical symptoms of attrition (strong loss of weight, permanent sleeplessness, high blood pressuren etc.) have lasted for more than 9-months. The heart attack itself happens in the epileptic crisis (EC) and is directed by the brain, the HH (Hamer focus) contracts and doesn't therefore send out any more signals to the heart muscle. The brain squeezes out the last remaining oedema/liquid. It is the flooding of the slow-heart-beat-center in the brain by the expelled fluid of the brain oedema during the reparation phase that causes the signal to the heart to become absent, thereby stopping the heart, and the patient has a heart attack.
In the reparation phase, the cells that have been brocken down in the arteries and veins will be replaced by excessive repair cells and thus reduce their diameter, which will result in higher blood pressure.
In the book, I give an example of a successful businessman, who was exeprience a territorial conflict, and had all the classic symtoms in the conflict-active phase. He wen to a seminar given by Harald (or his wife did), understood GNM and understood that he was suffering a territorial conflict and in the reparation phase would get a heart attack.
The businesman recognised this, retired from the business, solved his territorial conflict and 2 months later got his expected heart-attack. He was prepared for it, stayed at home, didn't go to hospital and recovered slowly over time.
I'll talk about heart attacks. which are called heart infarcts.
The conflict is a territorial conflict. Someone or something is challenging your territory and u are fighting for it. Dr Hamer, gives the example of a stag being challenged for control by a younger stag. In the conflict-active phase, the arteries ulcerated and widen so that more blood flows and the animal/person has more energy to fight back for his territory.
Once the territory conflict is resolved the arteries repair themselves in the reparation phase. A territorial conflict can be fatal only if the typical symptoms of attrition (strong loss of weight, permanent sleeplessness, high blood pressuren etc.) have lasted for more than 9-months. The heart attack itself happens in the epileptic crisis (EC) and is directed by the brain, the HH (Hamer focus) contracts and doesn't therefore send out any more signals to the heart muscle. The brain squeezes out the last remaining oedema/liquid. It is the flooding of the slow-heart-beat-center in the brain by the expelled fluid of the brain oedema during the reparation phase that causes the signal to the heart to become absent, thereby stopping the heart, and the patient has a heart attack.
In the reparation phase, the cells that have been brocken down in the arteries and veins will be replaced by excessive repair cells and thus reduce their diameter, which will result in higher blood pressure.
In the book, I give an example of a successful businessman, who was exeprience a territorial conflict, and had all the classic symtoms in the conflict-active phase. He wen to a seminar given by Harald (or his wife did), understood GNM and understood that he was suffering a territorial conflict and in the reparation phase would get a heart attack.
The businesman recognised this, retired from the business, solved his territorial conflict and 2 months later got his expected heart-attack. He was prepared for it, stayed at home, didn't go to hospital and recovered slowly over time.
Brain CT-picture of a patient with a heart attack. The Hamer Focus in the right temporal lobe (the relay corresponding to the coronary arteries according to Dr.Hamer's findings) has the form of an edema with glia (commonly diagnosed as a brain tumour), not of a target ring, since the heart attack appears during the healing phase, specifically more or less 4-6 weeks after the solution of the biological conflict of "territorial loss" (e.g. loss of the job, wife, sons, properties, car, etc.)
Brain CT-picture of a patient with angina pectoris and necrosis in the right testicle. The wide white circle is an artefact; the arrow at right points out to the Hamer Focus in the right temporal lobe corresponding to the coronary arteries (territorial loss conflict in the conflict active phase with angina pectoris); the arrow at left points out to the Hamer Focus in the brain relay which controls the right testicle, corresponding to the necrosis of the right testicle (loss conflict).
Testicle CT picture of the same patient's right testicle.26-What about mental disorders (like depression or psicosis) or eating disorders like anorexia or bulimia? Does Hamer's theory explain these diseases?
A heart attack is caused by a resolved territorial conflict.
Now in the case of so-called mental diseases, they are caused by territorial conflicts on both brain-sides.
Just say a person gets a territorial conflict on one brain side, and then gets another territorial conflict. If it occured on the same brain side, it would make the existing territorial conflict much worse and would result in death (massive heart attack) if both conflicts were resolved, because they had been ongoing for a long time. The body has this meta programme and causes the second territorial conflict to hit the other brain side.
So say the person is a right-handed male. First conflict hits the right cerebral cortex. HH on right cerebral cortex, target configuration around the affected brain relay. The next territorial conflcict hits the left cerebral cortex. Again, HH on left cerebral cortex, target configuration around the affected brain relay.
The person is now "mad", a manic-depressive, and depending on which conflict is stronger, the mania strengthens or the depression deepens. That's it. the solution is to resolve the individual conflicts and the person will no longer be mad.
The basic principle applies for all mental disorders both brain sides are affected, all psychoses, eating disorders etc.
Experiment
The way to prove this experimentally is to get a brain CT-scan done on a patient who is "mad". There will be at least two HHs in the left and right brain sides, and this is what is causing the "madness".
27-Suppose that a curious and open minded scholar, professional physician, medical student or independent researcher is reading this interview and being sympathetic to some of Hamer's ideas, he is still skeptical of his theses and claims. What would you suggest to him in order to verify empirically, and by himself, Hamer's theory?
To be honest I would say just get Dr Hamer's disease chart and just study it. It's truly incredible. He has made the connection between the type of shock, the affected brain relay and the affected organ and what happens to all three components of the human trinity in the conflcit active phase and the reparation phase.
A heart attack is caused by a resolved territorial conflict.
Now in the case of so-called mental diseases, they are caused by territorial conflicts on both brain-sides.
Just say a person gets a territorial conflict on one brain side, and then gets another territorial conflict. If it occured on the same brain side, it would make the existing territorial conflict much worse and would result in death (massive heart attack) if both conflicts were resolved, because they had been ongoing for a long time. The body has this meta programme and causes the second territorial conflict to hit the other brain side.
So say the person is a right-handed male. First conflict hits the right cerebral cortex. HH on right cerebral cortex, target configuration around the affected brain relay. The next territorial conflcict hits the left cerebral cortex. Again, HH on left cerebral cortex, target configuration around the affected brain relay.
The person is now "mad", a manic-depressive, and depending on which conflict is stronger, the mania strengthens or the depression deepens. That's it. the solution is to resolve the individual conflicts and the person will no longer be mad.
The basic principle applies for all mental disorders both brain sides are affected, all psychoses, eating disorders etc.
Experiment
The way to prove this experimentally is to get a brain CT-scan done on a patient who is "mad". There will be at least two HHs in the left and right brain sides, and this is what is causing the "madness".
27-Suppose that a curious and open minded scholar, professional physician, medical student or independent researcher is reading this interview and being sympathetic to some of Hamer's ideas, he is still skeptical of his theses and claims. What would you suggest to him in order to verify empirically, and by himself, Hamer's theory?
To be honest I would say just get Dr Hamer's disease chart and just study it. It's truly incredible. He has made the connection between the type of shock, the affected brain relay and the affected organ and what happens to all three components of the human trinity in the conflcit active phase and the reparation phase.
Dr.Hamer's disease chart published in English
I am convinced that the fact that pathogenic viruses don't exist is the Achilles Heel of Modern Medicine. Again they have never been 1) isolated, 2) photographed and 3) biochemically characterised. Now some people I tell all this to say I have been brainwashed. How is this possible when I have never met Dr Lanka, but have read some of his books and understand the core idea. I am brainnwashed the other way by Modern Medicine. Fortunately I manage to tune most of it out, but when I listen sometimes to the MDs, they upset me.
I have written to the Irish health authorities such as Professor Bill Hall Director NVRL National Virus Reference Laboratory; Dr Darina O'Flanagan Director HPSC darina.oflanagan@mailx.hse.ie and the Irish Minister for Health Minister's_Office@health.irlgov.ie repeatedly over a 4-year period asking for proof of the existence of the H1N1 virus, mumps, measles and rubella viruses. I give these e-mail addresses to prove this is no idle claim of mine that viruses don't exist, this is "evidenced" by the fact that Professor Bill Hall nor any other virologist cannot isolate any pathogenic virus. The Irish Minister for Health has so far refused to compel the Irish expert Professor Bill Hall to name a scientific paper proving the existence of ANY pathogenic virus.
I am attempting to pin the medical profession and the virologists / biologists down and request proof for the existence of ANY pathogenic virus. There is none, because none exists, but they continue on, recommending vaccines against non-existent viruses. It is madness!
It's frustrating that none of them have the guts to admit that pathogenic viruses don't exist.
So I would challenge any virologist to admit 1) that "pathogenic viruses" are detected currently by indirect means and that 2) there is no evidence that they exist, they cannot be proven to directly exist, even though this is technologically possible.
28-Suppose this same person wants to study books about it, or even to participate in seminars or lectures about Hamer's theory in order to learn more of the topic. What books in English and other languages would you suggest to him? What people in America and Europe are competent to teach Hamer's theory correctly?
I recommend my book of course The Ultimate Conspiracy: The Biomedical Paradigm as a general introduction to the New Medicine and Dr Lanka's work. I definitly recommend buying Dr Hamer's disease chart in conjunction with attending a course on GNM.
I understand there are two people in Canada teaching GNM, Ilsedora Laker and Caroline Markolin. I have no hesitation in recommending them both. ILsedora helped me out at the start when I wanted to find out more about GNM and she put me in touch with the Swiss GNM therapist Harald Baumann. I am grateful to Ilsedora for all her help and support.
Harald Baumann is willing to give more courses on GNM in Ireland, so if I get enough interest I will organise regular courses on GNM with Harald Baumann.
I am aware of the brilliant work with Marco Pfister with ALBA in Italy.
The only book of Dr Hamer's in English is Summary of the New Medicine, which I recommend. I hope his other work is translated into English soon. Dr Hamer is a genius, and will be recognised as the greatest ever MD. Hopefully soon!
29-What websites or online resources would you recommend to people interested in Hamer's theory and related topics?
In English language Ilsedora Laker's website is www.newmedicine.ca and Caroline Markolin's website is http://www.learninggnm.com/
My book's website is www.the-ultimate-conspiracy.com
Dr Lanka has a german language website www.klein-klein-aktion.de. There is no website in English yet about the missing viruses. I hope to set one up with all my e-mails and letters to the Irish and English health authorities.
30-Would you like to add something else to end the interview?
Jime,
Having studied GNM and the missing viruses for a few years now, I believe I can make the following comments with some authority:
People, the vast majority of people cannot think for themselves. They believe they can, but when you tell them something that goes against what they have been repeatedly told and believed to be true such as "There is no scientific proof that pathogenic viruses exist", they look at you as if u are an alien, and then they cite all the studies and photographs they have seen. Some of the more intellectual, take it as a personal affront that you question what they have been taught, and learned and assumed to be true all their lives.
Once the germ theory of disease is accepted to be false, Dr Hamer's GNM will I believe be officially tested and accepted in short order. This is why I am putting in such a massive effort to compel the relevant Irish expert Professor Bill Hall to isolate any pathogenic virus and write up a scientific paper about how he did it, so that it can be re-produced by other scientists, OR admit he can't provide any such evidence because none exist.
Jime, your questions indicate a profound knowledge of GNM and the missing evidence for the existence of any pathogenic virus. It is a pleasure to answer them and I wish you the very best with your future efforts.
I have written to the Irish health authorities such as Professor Bill Hall Director NVRL National Virus Reference Laboratory
0 comments:
Post a Comment