As the readers of my blog know, I've presented a lot of videos and information about critical views on the mainstream AIDS theory. The idea is that you know that scientific criticisms about the official AIDS theory exist; so you can draw your own informed conclusions or opinions.
The highly economic-influenced mainstream medical-science, and its uncritical followers (e.g. pseudo-skeptics), have been clever enough to stigmatize as "AIDS denialists" those who disagree or question with the official AIDS theory.
Actually, most critics of the mainstream AIDS theory don't deny the existence of AIDS (therefore, the don't "deny" AIDS), but the THEORY according to which HIV causes AIDS. They don't dispute the existence of a clinical picture known as AIDS, but dispute the role of HIV in the cause of this disease. (So, the debate posed by scientific dissents is about the causes of AIDS, not about the factual existence of AIDS itself)
Therefore, conflating the fact of AIDS with the "theory about the origin of AIDS" is proper of ignorant or intellectually impaired individuals; or of individuals who INTENTIONALLY make that conflation to misrepresent and stigmatize (while avoiding scientific debate) those who, with scientific arguments, casts doubts on the official AIDS theory.
This point is important, because the "AIDS denialists" label is a clever rhetorical trick to discredit those scientists who dare to make unconfortable and critical questions on the theory of AIDS.
The idea is not that you believe whatever you read, but that you think for yourselves.
The following videos are a good introduction to the scientists critical of AIDS theory and their claims:
The highly economic-influenced mainstream medical-science, and its uncritical followers (e.g. pseudo-skeptics), have been clever enough to stigmatize as "AIDS denialists" those who disagree or question with the official AIDS theory.
Actually, most critics of the mainstream AIDS theory don't deny the existence of AIDS (therefore, the don't "deny" AIDS), but the THEORY according to which HIV causes AIDS. They don't dispute the existence of a clinical picture known as AIDS, but dispute the role of HIV in the cause of this disease. (So, the debate posed by scientific dissents is about the causes of AIDS, not about the factual existence of AIDS itself)
Therefore, conflating the fact of AIDS with the "theory about the origin of AIDS" is proper of ignorant or intellectually impaired individuals; or of individuals who INTENTIONALLY make that conflation to misrepresent and stigmatize (while avoiding scientific debate) those who, with scientific arguments, casts doubts on the official AIDS theory.
This point is important, because the "AIDS denialists" label is a clever rhetorical trick to discredit those scientists who dare to make unconfortable and critical questions on the theory of AIDS.
The idea is not that you believe whatever you read, but that you think for yourselves.
The following videos are a good introduction to the scientists critical of AIDS theory and their claims:
More information:
-Henry Bauer's excellent and well-documented blog critical of the mainstream AIDS theory.
-Website "Science Guardian"
-Website "Science Guardian"
0 comments:
Post a Comment