Lynne McTaggart
Dr.Ryke Geerd Hamer
Noetic scientist Lynne McTaggart has written several excellent books about parapsychological matters (e.g. the Intention Experiment or The Field) and one of her lastest book is entitled The Cancer Handbook, which is about cancer and the most effective therapies to treat it.
McTaggart comments about the controversial physician Ryke Geerd Hamer's theory about cancer. It seems to me that McTaggart unintentionally gives a misleading introduction to Hamer's theory (which is highly complex and very easy to misunderstand).
She begins saying that "Unlike most other practitioners, the work of the German cancer specialist Dr.Ryke Geerd Hamer concentrates almost exclusively on the causes of cancer" (p. 129)
This is a common misunderstanding and is demostrably false. It is true that Hamer's work began examining only cases of cancer, but since 1987 (see the first edition of his book Vermächtnis einer Neuen Medizin) Hamer's theoy embraces all the diseases known in medicine (except some congenital diseases, diseases by insufficience of nutrients, diseases by wounds, radiation and intoxications).
His lastest researches focuses on dental diseases (odontology) and mental diseases (psychiatry). (Unfortunately, the literature about it exists only in German, and it is not easy to get). For a recent explanation of Hamer's discoveries on mental illnesses by an independent author, see Björn Eybl's book Die seelischen Ursachen der Krankheiten: Nach den 5 biologischen Naturgesetzen, entdeckt von Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer.
McTaggart continues "Once the cause is recognized and faced, the cure will follow, he argues, as the body's own remarkable self-healing processes are freeded to come into play"
This is another misleading explanation of Hamer's view. It is not enough that the cause (the biological conflict) is "recognized and faced", but that such a biological conflict has to be SOLVED definitively (and in many cases it is very hard to get).
McTaggart: "In the case of breast cancer, the shock or trauma would have occured two to four months prior to the clinical detection of the cancer if the woman is right-handed"
This is another misleading statement which, taken literally, is false. According to Hamer, the laterality (the property of being right-handed or left-handed) is irrelevant regarding the TIME in which the cancer is clinically detected. Laterality only plays a role in the connection between the conflict and the organ which is affected, not regarding the time of the clinical detection of it.
By the way, McTaggart doesn't differentiate between glandular breast cancer (which can be detected just a few months after the conflict) and intraductal mammary carcinoma (which only could be detected after the solution of the conflict... a conflict which could last for years). Both cancer are clinically different (as any oncolologist could attest) and, from the point of view of Hamer's theory, conflictually different too (in addition to being qualitatively different in terms of the phases in which each tumour grows).
For more on breast cancer according to Hamer's theory, see these videos in youtube.
McTaggart makes other comments about Hamer's theory, but I think the above ones are the most wrong or misleading.
Some months ago, I interviewed a follower of Hamer's theory which you can read here.
For an introduction to Hamer's basic ideas on the origin of cancer and other diseases, watch this extensive documentary (press the "CC" bottom in the video below to activate the English subtitles):
McTaggart comments about the controversial physician Ryke Geerd Hamer's theory about cancer. It seems to me that McTaggart unintentionally gives a misleading introduction to Hamer's theory (which is highly complex and very easy to misunderstand).
She begins saying that "Unlike most other practitioners, the work of the German cancer specialist Dr.Ryke Geerd Hamer concentrates almost exclusively on the causes of cancer" (p. 129)
This is a common misunderstanding and is demostrably false. It is true that Hamer's work began examining only cases of cancer, but since 1987 (see the first edition of his book Vermächtnis einer Neuen Medizin) Hamer's theoy embraces all the diseases known in medicine (except some congenital diseases, diseases by insufficience of nutrients, diseases by wounds, radiation and intoxications).
His lastest researches focuses on dental diseases (odontology) and mental diseases (psychiatry). (Unfortunately, the literature about it exists only in German, and it is not easy to get). For a recent explanation of Hamer's discoveries on mental illnesses by an independent author, see Björn Eybl's book Die seelischen Ursachen der Krankheiten: Nach den 5 biologischen Naturgesetzen, entdeckt von Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer.
McTaggart continues "Once the cause is recognized and faced, the cure will follow, he argues, as the body's own remarkable self-healing processes are freeded to come into play"
This is another misleading explanation of Hamer's view. It is not enough that the cause (the biological conflict) is "recognized and faced", but that such a biological conflict has to be SOLVED definitively (and in many cases it is very hard to get).
McTaggart: "In the case of breast cancer, the shock or trauma would have occured two to four months prior to the clinical detection of the cancer if the woman is right-handed"
This is another misleading statement which, taken literally, is false. According to Hamer, the laterality (the property of being right-handed or left-handed) is irrelevant regarding the TIME in which the cancer is clinically detected. Laterality only plays a role in the connection between the conflict and the organ which is affected, not regarding the time of the clinical detection of it.
By the way, McTaggart doesn't differentiate between glandular breast cancer (which can be detected just a few months after the conflict) and intraductal mammary carcinoma (which only could be detected after the solution of the conflict... a conflict which could last for years). Both cancer are clinically different (as any oncolologist could attest) and, from the point of view of Hamer's theory, conflictually different too (in addition to being qualitatively different in terms of the phases in which each tumour grows).
For more on breast cancer according to Hamer's theory, see these videos in youtube.
McTaggart makes other comments about Hamer's theory, but I think the above ones are the most wrong or misleading.
Some months ago, I interviewed a follower of Hamer's theory which you can read here.
For an introduction to Hamer's basic ideas on the origin of cancer and other diseases, watch this extensive documentary (press the "CC" bottom in the video below to activate the English subtitles):
0 comments:
Post a Comment